seen things I never believe. I've seen today is spent the same amount as the GDP of a small country to make a film that certainly do not transcend.
The other day I found out what has become the actor Tom Hanks to star in the movie "Angels and Demons. About $ 50 million it has pocketed a friend.
A little known film you've seen this film does not go down in history, not even bother producer buy some oscar (Yes, no mistake, the Oscars are purchased) to profit at the box office or someone in the limelight . This movie is what is now known as a "Blockbuster". A movie based on a book of more or less success with big budget and a cast of actors well known but is not intended to be a good movie and box office results will give more than profitable for its producer. My point with this post, is to break a lance, and not by the film classic of the decades of 40-50-60 as would any self-respecting gafapasta but the cinema of the 80's and early 90's that also come in this genre "Blockbuster" but with nuances. I mean blockbusters movies juvenile court and not so that marked an era for a generation like mine. Movies that despite these mountains do not spend money (although neither were low budget) if they have transcended but nobody expected it.
Here are a few titles: Ghostbusters, Back to the Future, The Goonies, The gremlims, Short, Tiburon, Raiders of the Lost Ark, Teenwolf, The Breakfast Club ...
brings me to the conclusion that ideas are scarce in Hollywood more than ever and that every time the "star system" is more like a money making machine to machine to show adventures and dreams. Today
frikipuntos
distribution. One for each film of the 80-90 that meets the characteristics that I mentioned at the entrance and contesteis me in the comments. And the universe megasuperfrikipunto you know that movie is the phrase being the title of the entry.
But all these films will be lost in time like tears in rain.
0 comments:
Post a Comment